The court grants, in part, the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his complaint for willful violation of the stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(k). In that regard, there is no material dispute as to the Defendant’s liability based upon her actions regarding her garnishment of the Chapter 7 Plaintiff-Debtor’s post-petition wages. The court set a subsequent hearing to determine damages.
You are here
Click here to view.
Honorable David L. Bissett
The court determines that the Plaintiff’s state court judgment against the Defendant is non-dischargeable: the Plaintiff meets her burden of proof under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). The Defendant misrepresented himself as a licensed Contractor.